Join us for a dinner and networking event Wednesday December 4, 2024 at the Westwood Tavern in Schaumburg, IL. The lecture, presented by Natasha Hausler Banke PhD, will cover learnings and insights on In-Situ analysis of the presence of a photoinitiator after curing.
Over the past few years, regulatory reclassifications have continued to change how ink manufacturers world-wide formulate UV cured inks. Adding a chemical to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) list triggers changes in regulatory reporting. Manufacturers and importers of articles which contain the SVHC become legally required to notify customers/consumers if the concentration is greater than 0.1% w/w. In addition, ECHA must be notified if the total amount of SVHC imported into an EU country is greater than 1 metric ton/ year. While inclusion on the list is not a ban on use, it has this effect for ink manufacturers. For example, member companies of the European Printing Ink Association (EuPIA) agree to abide by the Exclusion Policy, which requires formulating inks away from the use of an SVHC. Additionally, brand owners may have similar requirements for packaging and printing inks. Under general exclusions for ink formulations, the Nestlé guidance states an SVHC “must not be used where suitable alternatives exist.” In contrast to some European regulations, the USFDA does not explicitly regulate the contents of printing ink. However, the USFDA does regulate the food additives. Subsequently, it is the responsibility of the manufacturer of a food contact substance (FCS) to ensure the FCM is consistent with applicable authorizations and does not adulterate food.
Differing regulations between Europe and the US frequently lead to fit-for-use questions of ink formulations. We are commonly asked what substances are acceptable for use and what residual ink components are present in the matrix of the cured print. In response to previous customer questions and regulatory changes, INX has undertaken several studies to evaluate exposure of an SVHC during the manufacturing process. As an extension of previously completed work, the current study evaluates the presence of residual PI369 in a cured print and determine if that print contains levels of the residual SVHC above labeling requirements in the EU (0.1%).
Natasha Hausler Banke, PhD – Director, Analytical R&D INX International Ink Company
“I now have a better understanding of how HPLC works and why column choice is so important.”
“It is a fantastic course for learning the theory of LC and method development”
“The instructor, Merlin Bicking, is very helpful. It was great to see how wiling he is to answer questions and all the variety of methods he worked on.”
“I am just beginning my position from out of school. I found the course very insightful in terms of preparation for my future career”
“It is very useful for me because having hands on experience, which helped me to understand more of HPLC.”
“Great class. Would easily take again and recommend Dr. Merlin anytime. Would love to take his other courses. If he had a book would quickly buy for reference.”
Leave a Comment
Last Updated: November 12, 2024 by CCDG
Upcoming! CCDG Dinner Lecture: Food packaging and LCMS risk analysis
Register Here
Join us for a dinner and networking event Wednesday December 4, 2024 at the Westwood Tavern in Schaumburg, IL. The lecture, presented by Natasha Hausler Banke PhD, will cover learnings and insights on In-Situ analysis of the presence of a photoinitiator after curing.
Over the past few years, regulatory reclassifications have continued to change how ink manufacturers world-wide formulate UV cured inks. Adding a chemical to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) list triggers changes in regulatory reporting. Manufacturers and importers of articles which contain the SVHC become legally required to notify customers/consumers if the concentration is greater than 0.1% w/w. In addition, ECHA must be notified if the total amount of SVHC imported into an EU country is greater than 1 metric ton/ year. While inclusion on the list is not a ban on use, it has this effect for ink manufacturers. For example, member companies of the European Printing Ink Association (EuPIA) agree to abide by the Exclusion Policy, which requires formulating inks away from the use of an SVHC. Additionally, brand owners may have similar requirements for packaging and printing inks. Under general exclusions for ink formulations, the Nestlé guidance states an SVHC “must not be used where suitable alternatives exist.” In contrast to some European regulations, the USFDA does not explicitly regulate the contents of printing ink. However, the USFDA does regulate the food additives. Subsequently, it is the responsibility of the manufacturer of a food contact substance (FCS) to ensure the FCM is consistent with applicable authorizations and does not adulterate food.
Differing regulations between Europe and the US frequently lead to fit-for-use questions of ink formulations. We are commonly asked what substances are acceptable for use and what residual ink components are present in the matrix of the cured print. In response to previous customer questions and regulatory changes, INX has undertaken several studies to evaluate exposure of an SVHC during the manufacturing process. As an extension of previously completed work, the current study evaluates the presence of residual PI369 in a cured print and determine if that print contains levels of the residual SVHC above labeling requirements in the EU (0.1%).
Natasha Hausler Banke, PhD – Director, Analytical R&D INX International Ink Company
Category: Uncategorized
LC School Reviews
“I now have a better understanding of how HPLC works and why column choice is so important.”
“It is a fantastic course for learning the theory of LC and method development”
“The instructor, Merlin Bicking, is very helpful. It was great to see how wiling he is to answer questions and all the variety of methods he worked on.”
“I am just beginning my position from out of school. I found the course very insightful in terms of preparation for my future career”
“It is very useful for me because having hands on experience, which helped me to understand more of HPLC.”
“Great class. Would easily take again and recommend Dr. Merlin anytime. Would love to take his other courses. If he had a book would quickly buy for reference.”